The immediate reaction to England’s uninspiring performance against Slovenia wasn’t what you might expect. Instead of further criticism, leading UK bookmakers began shortening the odds for England to win Euro 2024. This wasn’t due to a sudden surge in optimism about their play, but rather a cold, hard look at the evolving tournament bracket and the Euros Standings 2024.
The odds shift wasn’t exclusive to England; Italy, Austria, and Switzerland also saw their odds improve. Conversely, the perceived frontrunners like France, Spain, Germany, and Portugal saw their odds lengthen. This reshuffling wasn’t about who played best in the group stage, but about the increasingly clear and lopsided nature of the knockout draw.
In a hypothetical scenario with a free draw after the groups, the powerhouses of European football – Spain, Germany, Portugal, and even a struggling France – would likely dominate the latter stages. However, Euro 2024’s pre-determined bracket has created a starkly different landscape. France’s inability to win their group has exacerbated this imbalance, placing them alongside Spain, Germany, Portugal, and Denmark in what is now a heavily stacked top half of the bracket. Belgium, after finishing second in their group, also finds themselves in this challenging section.
[
Euro 2024 Knockout Bracket Analysis: Diagram illustrating the potential paths for England and other national teams in the Euro 2024 tournament based on current group standings.
The bottom half of the bracket, in stark contrast, appears significantly less daunting on paper. Switzerland is set to face Italy, and England will play their round of 16 match on Sunday. However, a closer look reveals that Switzerland, Italy, and England each only managed a single win during the group stage. Adding Slovakia to this mix, another team in this section, brings the combined wins to just four out of a possible twelve for these teams.
This means, remarkably, a team with only one group stage victory is guaranteed a path to the semi-finals from the bottom half of the draw. Their potential semi-final opponents would likely be drawn from Austria, Belgium, or the Netherlands – credible teams, but arguably not on the same level as the potential matchups in the other half, where Spain or Germany could face Portugal or France.
Following England’s scoreless draw against Slovenia, Gareth Southgate was directly asked if England had benefited from a fortunate bracket. “We shouldn’t be seduced by which half of the draw,” he cautioned. “We have to take a step at a time. Tonight was an improvement. We’ve got to improve to win the next round.”
In the subsequent press conference, the bracket’s structure was further clarified to Southgate – England was indeed positioned to avoid Germany, France, Spain, and Portugal until a potential final. While acknowledging the strength of the teams in the opposite half, Southgate maintained, “We have huge respect for all of the teams you’ve mentioned but equally, there are some very good teams on our side of the draw.”
However, the reality is that the draw is not equally balanced. Similar to the 2018 World Cup, fortune has favored England and the other nations situated in the less congested side of the bracket. Austria, having topped their group ahead of France and the Netherlands, can justifiably claim to have earned their position, but the bracket’s inherent structure undeniably plays a significant role.
The 2018 World Cup serves as a stark reminder of bracket imbalances. Five of the top-ranked teams in the knockout stages were funneled into one half of the draw, while the other half was comparatively weaker. Belgium’s ‘golden generation’ arguably missed their best chance at major tournament glory due to this structure, winning their group but facing a brutal path that ended against France in the semi-finals. England, by contrast, benefited from finishing second in their group, navigating a gentler route to their own semi-final appearance.
Euro 2016 presented a similar narrative. Italy, impressive in the group stage, were rewarded with a place in the tougher side of the knockout bracket, eventually losing to Germany. Meanwhile, Portugal, who barely scraped through their group, found themselves on the opposite side and, against expectations, marched all the way to the final, defeating Croatia, Poland, and Wales along the way.
Unlike some competitions with free draws like the FA Cup, or those that rank teams based on regular season performance like the NFL or NBA to ensure balanced brackets, major international football tournaments operate differently. The Euro 2024 knockout bracket was predetermined from the initial draw, with group winners and runners-up assigned specific paths.
While the group stage draw is seeded, the allocation of teams to groups is random. This inherent randomness can lead to significant disparities in the knockout bracket’s balance. The condensed nature of these tournaments, hosted within a single nation over a short period, necessitates a pre-planned structure for logistical reasons, including travel and rest for teams.
Despite the structured approach, inconsistencies remain. Austria, for example, will enjoy a full seven days of rest before their round of 16 match, while Spain’s opponents will have only four days to recover.
Ultimately, knockout football is inherently unpredictable. However, the euros standings 2024 bracket suggests a strong possibility that a team that underperformed in the group stage could realistically reach the semi-final or even the final. For England, Switzerland, Italy, and others in the bottom half of this draw, the path to potential glory has become significantly smoother, offering a genuine springboard for a deep tournament run.
